Skip to content
Diego Pavia

#2Diego Pavia

QB·New Mexico State·2025202420235.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Diego Pavia is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for New Mexico State. Diego's 2023 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 528 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Diego's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Diego Pavia's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
221/366 Comp/Att2973 Pass yards26 Pass TD9 INT60.4% Comp %
Rushing
923 Rush yards7 Rush TD176 Carries5.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat97
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch89
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Liberty (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9000.90Wk 1 vs Western Illinois: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Liberty: +0.42 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs New Mexico: +0.74 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Hawai'i: +0.60 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Florida International: +0.47 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Sam Houston: +0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UTEP: +0.44 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.14 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Western Kentucky: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Auburn: +0.45 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Jacksonville State: +0.18 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +0.90 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsMassachusettsL30-41-17.516/27248329.5200
1vsWestern IllinoisW58-2116/203172080.0-800.27
2@LibertyL17-338.012/211501276.66300.42
3@New MexicoW27-17-16.59/142032084.29600.74
4@Hawai'iL17-20-16.49/151552083.29700.60
6vsFlorida InternationalW34-17-21.220/312562158.84610.47
7vsSam HoustonW27-13-13.820/362862092.311510.46
8@UTEPW28-7-16.215/251862078.79620.44
9@Louisiana TechW27-24-12.910/19951054.46710.14
10vsMiddle TennesseeW13-7-9.516/312200133.36700.16
11@Western KentuckyW38-29-2.014/241412069.44400.34
12@AuburnW31-107.619/282013089.13500.45
13vsJacksonville StateW20-17-1.623/342691256.46800.18
14@LibertyL35-498.011/161883096.34510.90
20vsFresno StateL10-372.511/25580113.3721

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.7%
Passing plays
93.3%
Rushing plays
31.1%
Standard downs
52.1%
Passing downs
75.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.990−0.1220242025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 41 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023New Mexico State
5.1
234.5
2024Vanderbilt
6.9
217.9
2025Vanderbilt
13.6
282.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.