Skip to content
Diego Pavia

#2Diego Pavia

QB·Vanderbilt·2025202420236.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Diego Pavia is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Vanderbilt. Diego's 2024 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 486 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Diego's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Diego Pavia's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
177/298 Comp/Att2293 Pass yards20 Pass TD4 INT59.4% Comp %
Rushing
800 Rush yards8 Rush TD193 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency30
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat68
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch96
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Alabama (SP+ 25).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +0.49 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alcorn State: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia State: +0.24 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Alabama: +0.60 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kentucky: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ball State: +0.50 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: +0.17 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Auburn: +0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Carolina: +0.11 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs LSU: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tennessee: +0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsVirginia TechW34-2710.012/161902082.610410.49
2vsAlcorn StateW55-010/13830053.05110.25
3@Georgia StateL32-36-17.918/332702043.34000.24
4@MissouriL27-3014.014/231782085.38400.27
6vsAlabamaW40-3525.016/202522095.95600.60
7@KentuckyW20-135.515/181432187.45300.26
8vsBall StateW24-14-19.817/312751061.98210.50
9vsTexasL24-2724.116/291432278.16710.17
10@AuburnW17-79.59/221432044.22600.14
11vsSouth CarolinaL7-2816.916/311660078.66510.11
13@LSUL17-2415.913/241861066.74310.19
14vsTennesseeL23-3622.08/171041146.74500.08
20vsGeorgia TechW35-271.913/211603083.8842

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
63.0%
Passing plays
97.8%
Rushing plays
38.2%
Standard downs
55.2%
Passing downs
78.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.990−0.1220242025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 41 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023New Mexico State
5.1
234.5
2024Vanderbilt
6.9
217.9
2025Vanderbilt
13.6
282.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.