Skip to content
DeWayne McBride

#22DeWayne McBride

RB·UAB·202220215.8 pts line value1st Round

DeWayne McBride is a 2-year Featured Back for UAB. DeWayne's 2022 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 222 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So DeWayne McBride's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1710 Rush yards19 Rush TD233 Carries7.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions10 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume92
  • Explosiveness86
  • Consistency73
  • Receiving8
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (88th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.29 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6
Tyjae SpearsTulane0.4505.7105.3
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2901.29Wk 2 vs Liberty: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: +0.26 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Rice: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Middle Tennessee: +1.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Charlotte: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Western Kentucky: +0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.26 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UTSA: +0.61 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Texas: +0.69 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs LSU: -0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Louisiana Tech: +1.29 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@LibertyL14-21-1.5201778.910.22
3vsGeorgia SouthernW35-21-6.4282238.040.26
5@RiceL24-28-15.2271214.510.15
6vsMiddle TennesseeW41-14-6.91212010.031.12
7vsCharlotteW34-20-16.4291374.720.29
8@Western KentuckyL17-201.7241978.200.14
9@Florida AtlanticL17-24-7.1241687.011400.26
10vsUTSAL38-447.2191417.420.61
11vsNorth TexasW41-21-1.5211205.730.69
12@LSUL10-4116.213342.61160-0.08
13@Louisiana TechW37-27-17.81627217.011.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.2%
Passing plays
1.5%
Rushing plays
51.6%
Standard downs
40.5%
Passing downs
14.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.93
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.20 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.470−0.702022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021UAB
2.6
59.4
2022UAB
5.8
101.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.