Skip to content
David Cobb

#27David Cobb

RB·Minnesota·20143.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

David Cobb is a Featured Back for Minnesota. David's 2014 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 331 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So David Cobb's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1629 Rush yards13 Rush TD315 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions162 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency49
  • Receiving36
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency49th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee (SP+ -9).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5200.52Wk 1 vs Eastern Illinois: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.52 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs TCU: -0.34 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs San José State: +0.22 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Michigan: +0.16 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Northwestern: -0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.05 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Illinois: +0.10 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Iowa: +0.30 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ohio State: +0.34 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Nebraska: +0.17 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wisconsin: -0.11 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Missouri: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEastern IllinoisW42-2014715.1022200.35
2vsMiddle TennesseeW35-24-8.7292207.620.52
3@TCUL7-3023.315412.701160-0.34
4vsSan José StateW24-7-11.5342076.120.22
5@MichiganW30-148.2321835.7035000.16
7vsNorthwesternW24-171.530973.20150-0.09
8vsPurdueW39-38-6.2351945.511000.05
9@IllinoisL24-280.4221185.422700.10
11vsIowaW51-146.816744.610.30
12vsOhio StateL24-3125.8271455.430.34
13@NebraskaW28-2413.115805.3122900.17
14@WisconsinL24-3420.8251184.71-0.11
1vsMissouriL17-3319.321813.9043300.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
38.7%
Passing plays
7.7%
Rushing plays
54.4%
Standard downs
45.0%
Passing downs
23.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.600−0.42
EPA per play · 2014 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.