Skip to content
Jeremy McNichols
Jeremy McNichols

#13Jeremy McNichols

RB·Boise State·201620154.7 pts line value1st Round

Jeremy McNichols is a 2-year Featured Back for Boise State. Jeremy's 2016 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 344 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeremy McNichols's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1709 Rush yards23 Rush TD314 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
37 Receptions474 Rec yards4 Rec TD12.8 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns72 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency70
  • Receiving44
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.89 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Louisiana (SP+ -9).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
D'Onta ForemanTexas0.3405.3112.9
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Mohamed IbrahimMinnesota0.3305.3103.6
Jonathan TaylorWisconsin0.3504.8107.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8900.89Wk 1 vs Louisiana: +0.89 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Oregon State: +0.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah State: -0.01 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs New Mexico: -0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado State: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wyoming: +0.35 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs San José State: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: +0.59 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.46 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Air Force: -0.12 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Baylor: +0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@LouisianaW45-10-8.79485.3239810.89
2vsWashington StateW31-286.2221165.3232500.14
4@Oregon StateW38-24-4.6282087.4342010.48
5vsUtah StateW21-10-4.4301324.406731-0.01
6@New MexicoW49-21-5.121542.62-0.05
7vsColorado StateW28-230.8402175.4244700.27
8vsBYUW28-278.0301404.71510910.32
9@WyomingL28-30-6.9181437.9221800.35
10vsSan José StateW45-31-13.6281585.621900.23
11@Hawai'iW52-16-10.1161539.6232900.59
12vsUNLVW42-25-14.3312066.6412200.46
13@Air ForceL20-274.422884.01-0.12
1vsBaylorL12-3111.319462.4052400.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.3%
Passing plays
9.6%
Rushing plays
66.0%
Standard downs
45.7%
Passing downs
22.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.77 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.990−0.222016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Boise State
2.4
60.5
2016Boise State
4.7
112.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.