Skip to content
Daniel Bray

#5Daniel Bray

RB·Utah·2025

Daniel Bray is a Pass-Catching Back for Utah. Daniel's 2025 season produced 9.0 total EPA across 43 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Daniel Bray's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
272 Rush yards1 Rush TD40 Carries6.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions67 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.4 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns95 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume21
  • Explosiveness76
  • Consistency20
  • Receiving78
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency20th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Arizona State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5900.59Wk 5 vs West Virginia: +0.25 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arizona State: +0.59 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: +0.50 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Colorado: -0.32 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: +0.25 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Baylor: -0.43 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kansas State: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kansas: -0.04 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
5@West VirginiaW48-14-6.833210.701200.25
7vsArizona StateW42-103.95418.201300.59
8@BYUL21-2415.91012112.110.50
9vsColoradoW53-7-8.3492.301110-0.32
10vsCincinnatiW45-144.59434.8034100.25
12@BaylorW55-281.44102.50-0.43
13vsKansas StateW51-477.0393.001500.23
14@KansasW31-214.1144.00150-0.04
20vsNebraskaW44-226.2133.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.5%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
10.5%
Standard downs
7.5%
Passing downs
7.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.