Skip to content
Clint Trickett

#9Clint Trickett

QB·West Virginia·20146.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Clint Trickett is a Clutch Passer for West Virginia. Clint's 2014 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 437 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Clint Trickett's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
281/419 Comp/Att3285 Pass yards18 Pass TD10 INT67.1% Comp %
Rushing
-106 Rush yards1 Rush TD42 Carries-2.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat38
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Towson.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Towson: +0.58 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Maryland: +0.42 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oklahoma: +0.22 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Kansas: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas Tech: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Baylor: +0.56 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: +0.33 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs TCU: +0.12 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas: -0.02 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Kansas State: -0.19 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAlabamaL23-3334.329/453651061.5-1100.29
2vsTowsonW54-035/403482086.91410.58
3@MarylandW40-375.737/495114181.6-400.42
4vsOklahomaL33-4519.225/413762249.9-1900.22
6vsKansasW33-14-9.820/353021170.00.31
7@Texas TechW37-344.928/443012064.6-1100.23
8vsBaylorW41-2723.923/353223182.8-2500.56
9@Oklahoma StateW34-108.621/302382051.5-1800.33
10vsTCUL30-3123.315/261621225.1-1000.12
11@TexasL16-339.036/492480120.4-70-0.02
13vsKansas StateL20-2616.312/251120222.0-150-0.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.6%
Passing plays
93.4%
Rushing plays
4.3%
Standard downs
42.3%
Passing downs
59.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.650−0.27
EPA per play · 2014 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.