Skip to content
CJ Verdell

#7CJ Verdell

RB·Oregon·20192.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

CJ Verdell is a Explosive Back for Oregon. CJ's 2019 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 210 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So CJ Verdell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1220 Rush yards8 Rush TD197 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions125 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume64
  • Explosiveness64
  • Consistency22
  • Receiving31
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency22th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 15 vs Utah (SP+ 20).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 1 vs Auburn: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nevada: +0.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Montana: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: -0.18 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs California: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington: +0.03 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington State: +0.79 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs USC: -0.29 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona: -0.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona State: +0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: -0.19 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Utah: +0.81 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: -0.39 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAuburnL21-2721.014765.41240-0.03
2vsNevadaW77-6-12.311605.510.33
3vsMontanaW35-35132.6012100.40
4@StanfordW21-6-4.724823.40-0.18
6vsCaliforniaW17-7-2.610464.6021700.32
7vsColoradoW45-3-4.11417112.202800.30
8@WashingtonW35-3118.311484.4021200.03
9vsWashington StateW37-3511.12325711.2345600.79
10@USCW56-2413.16122.00040-0.29
12vsArizonaW34-6-8.011494.50-0.05
13@Arizona StateL28-316.318995.500.07
14vsOregon StateW24-10-0.715503.30130-0.19
15vsUtahW37-1519.51820811.630.81
1vsWisconsinW28-2720.317492.90-0.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.3%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
40.5%
Standard downs
25.9%
Passing downs
13.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.930−0.51
EPA per play · 2019 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.