Skip to content
Champ Harris

#7Champ Harris

QB·Army·2023

Champ Harris is a Volume Passer for Army. Champ's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Champ Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
19/35 Comp/Att260 Pass yards0 Pass TD4 INT54.3% Comp %
Rushing
11 Rush yards1 Rush TD21 Carries0.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume40
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency41
  • Clutch12
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency41th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.94 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Massachusetts (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.7202.72Wk 2 vs Delaware State: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 7 vs Troy: -0.33 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs LSU: -0.42 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Massachusetts: +0.58 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Air Force: -0.96 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Coastal Carolina: -2.72 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsDelaware StateW57-03/4450032.8800.47
7vsTroyL0-199.86/1363012.9-170-0.33
8@LSUL0-6219.14/922020.5-90-0.42
9vsMassachusettsL14-21-17.56/8130007.92810.58
10vsAir ForceW23-35.910-0.96
12vsCoastal CarolinaW28-21-1.20/10010.1-2.72

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.1%
Passing plays
45.0%
Rushing plays
5.6%
Standard downs
12.6%
Passing downs
18.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.07
Passing downs
-0.21
Pass / Rush EPA
0.09 / -0.59

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.