Skip to content
Cam Cook

#4Cam Cook

RB·Jacksonville State·20252.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Cam Cook is a Pass-Catching Back for Jacksonville State. Cam's 2025 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 326 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cam Cook's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1666 Rush yards16 Rush TD296 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
30 Receptions286 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency75
  • Receiving70
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Delaware (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 1 vs UCF: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Liberty: +0.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Murray State: +0.47 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Southern Miss: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Sam Houston: +0.31 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Delaware: +0.60 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.13 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kennesaw State: +0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida International: -0.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Kentucky: +0.17 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Kennesaw State: -0.00 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@UCFL10-17-1.217754.4044300.10
2vsLibertyW34-24-9.0291956.720.27
3@Georgia SouthernL34-41-9.4211205.701000.10
4vsMurray StateW45-10221476.722500.47
5@Southern MissL25-42-7.122773.5147700.31
7vsSam HoustonW29-27-27.8312187.0221500.31
8vsDelawareW38-25-10.9181176.5332700.60
10@Middle TennesseeW24-21-16.0211055.0132100.13
11@UTEPW30-27-17.5191276.712-600.18
12vsKennesaw StateW35-26-5.4271324.911400.07
13@Florida InternationalL21-27-10.5251385.512460-0.02
14vsWestern KentuckyW37-341.6251375.5123100.17
15vsKennesaw StateL15-19-5.419784.114230-0.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
36.9%
Passing plays
14.3%
Rushing plays
50.1%
Standard downs
39.8%
Passing downs
29.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.660−0.08
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.