#13Bryson Daily

QB·Army·2024

Bryson Daily is a Dual-Threat QB for Army. Bryson's 2024 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 384 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryson Daily's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing

54/103 Comp/Att1007 Pass yards9 Pass TD4 INT52.4% Comp %

Rushing

1653 Rush yards32 Rush TD311 Carries5.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

Efficiency35
Volume100
Dual-Threat100
Consistency81
Clutch15

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.24 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Tulsa (SP+ -21).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsLehigh	W42-7	—	3/6	35	0	0	22.8	78	2	0.33
2	@Florida Atlantic	W24-7	-12.7	1/4	44	1	0	75.4	117	0	0.47
4	vsRice	W37-14	-11.4	6/9	107	2	0	95.8	145	3	0.43
5	@Temple	W42-14	-20.3	2/6	54	0	0	56.8	152	3	0.43
6	@Tulsa	W49-7	-20.6	5/5	140	2	0	99.2	110	2	1.24
7	vsUAB	W44-10	-11.3	3/7	102	1	0	99.9	136	4	0.74
8	vsEast Carolina	W45-28	-1.0	7/10	147	1	0	90.0	171	5	0.73
11	@North Texas	W14-3	-4.5	2/4	15	0	1	45.9	153	2	0.26
13	vsNotre Dame	L14-49	23.9	4/8	26	0	0	31.9	139	2	0.04
14	vsUTSA	W29-24	2.2	10/17	190	1	0	82.4	147	2	0.51
15	vsTulane	W35-14	5.7	2/2	17	0	0	95.0	126	4	0.59
16	vsNavy	L13-31	3.5	7/16	65	1	3	—	52	0	0.09
20	vsLouisiana Tech	W27-6	-11.6	2/9	65	0	0	84.5	127	3	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

48.8%

Passing plays

89.8%

Rushing plays

42.2%

Standard downs

46.1%

Passing downs

57.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.48
Passing downs: 0.36
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.47 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).