Skip to content
Brett Rypien

#4Brett Rypien

QB·Boise State·2018201610.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Brett Rypien is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Boise State. Brett's 2016 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 405 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brett Rypien's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
244/394 Comp/Att3646 Pass yards24 Pass TD8 INT61.9% Comp %
Rushing
-16 Rush yards2 Rush TD48 Carries-0.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat65
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch99
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (78th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.25 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs New Mexico (SP+ -5).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2501.25Wk 1 vs Louisiana: +0.59 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Oregon State: +0.11 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah State: +0.46 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs New Mexico: +1.25 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado State: +0.45 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: +0.77 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wyoming: +0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs San José State: +0.86 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: +1.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.22 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Air Force: +0.33 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Baylor: -0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@LouisianaW45-10-8.722/333472091.1-400.59
2vsWashington StateW31-286.219/352991361.7300.19
4@Oregon StateW38-24-4.619/362151041.2-1100.11
5vsUtah StateW21-10-4.415/241632066.5300.46
6@New MexicoW49-21-5.121/283915098.9101.25
7vsColorado StateW28-230.816/242071072.91500.45
8vsBYUW28-278.025/394423252.6-1500.77
9@WyomingL28-30-6.922/352950154.9-2400.28
10vsSan José StateW45-31-13.616/212193080.4-400.86
11@Hawai'iW52-16-10.118/223384096.01411.14
12vsUNLVW42-25-14.310/201090083.1510.22
13@Air ForceL20-274.49/263161024.5100.33
1vsBaylorL12-3111.332/513051240.300-0.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.2%
Passing plays
96.6%
Rushing plays
6.9%
Standard downs
39.7%
Passing downs
70.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.380−0.192018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Boise State
10.9
248.8
2018Boise State
10.5
275.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.