Skip to content
Brad Kaaya

#15Brad Kaaya

QB·Miami·2016201520149.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Brad Kaaya is a 3-year Clutch Passer for Miami. Brad's 2014 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 389 plays — a average rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brad Kaaya's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2014

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9375
National rank
#142
High school
Chaminade
Hometown
West Hills, CA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2014 Production

Passing
221/378 Comp/Att3198 Pass yards26 Pass TD12 INT58.5% Comp %
Rushing
-131 Rush yards1 Rush TD27 Carries-4.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency71
  • Clutch89
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.02 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Arkansas State (SP+ -0).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0201.02Wk 1 vs Louisville: +0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas State: +1.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: +0.32 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Duke: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia Tech: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: +0.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Carolina: +0.88 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Florida State: +0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Virginia: +0.16 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Pittsburgh: +0.39 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs South Carolina: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@LouisvilleL13-3117.017/291741214.8-1600.01
2vsFlorida A&MW41-712/221772258.7-100.14
3vsArkansas StateW41-20-0.316/243424190.7-1801.02
4@NebraskaL31-4113.128/423593264.6-2500.32
5vsDukeW22-107.020/342232056.6000.13
6@Georgia TechL17-2811.216/252451236.8-900.15
7vsCincinnatiW55-346.917/242863082.5-1310.56
9@Virginia TechW30-67.87/16921035.0000.02
10vsNorth CarolinaW47-200.011/171893079.3-1500.88
12vsFlorida StateL26-3028.516/343162170.1500.17
13@VirginiaL13-304.020/332631147.2-3300.16
14vsPittsburghL23-3514.122/452962068.1100.39
1vsSouth CarolinaL21-2417.419/332361135.3-700.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.6%
Passing plays
96.5%
Rushing plays
3.0%
Standard downs
42.4%
Passing downs
59.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / -0.62

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.160−0.5220152016
EPA per play · 2014 — 2016 · 38 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Miami
9.0
212.2
2015Miami
7.1
187.2
2016Miami
8.6
223.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.