Skip to content
Boston Scott

#6Boston Scott

RB·Louisiana Tech·20171.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Boston Scott is a Explosive Back for Louisiana Tech. Boston's 2017 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 189 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Boston Scott's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1040 Rush yards8 Rush TD182 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions181 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.1 Yards/rec
Returns
10 Kick returns183 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume64
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving51
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Alabama (SP+ -12).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9800.98Wk 1 vs Northwestern State: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mississippi State: -0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Western Kentucky: -0.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Carolina: +0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: +0.98 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UAB: -0.28 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.53 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rice: +0.48 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Texas: +0.10 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.09 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTEP: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTSA: +0.34 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs SMU: +0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwestern StateW52-249556.1045500.53
2vsMississippi StateL21-5716.013967.40280-0.01
3@Western KentuckyW23-22-4.98293.60120-0.02
4@South CarolinaL16-177.88172.1011000.09
5vsSouth AlabamaW34-16-12.067612.7122600.98
6@UABL22-2314483.401230-0.28
8vsSouthern MissL27-34-3.4111069.610.53
9@RiceW42-28-23.617875.130.48
10vsNorth TexasL23-24-4.516644.012800.10
11vsFlorida AtlanticL23-485.119874.6152400.09
12@UTEPW42-21-27.4221346.1022510.29
13vsUTSAW20-6-2.5201386.910.34
1vsSMUW51-10-2.9191035.400.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.3%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
38.4%
Standard downs
26.8%
Passing downs
12.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.110−0.41
EPA per play · 2017 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.