Skip to content
Bhayshul Tuten

#33Bhayshul Tuten

RB·Virginia Tech·20244.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Bhayshul Tuten is a Featured Back for Virginia Tech. Bhayshul's 2024 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 204 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bhayshul Tuten's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1158 Rush yards15 Rush TD183 Carries6.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions79 Rec yards2 Rec TD3.6 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns71 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume84
  • Explosiveness66
  • Consistency46
  • Receiving44
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Boston College (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Vanderbilt: +0.22 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Old Dominion: +0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Rutgers: +0.64 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Miami: +0.10 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Stanford: -0.00 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +0.96 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: +0.05 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Clemson: -0.49 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Duke: -0.06 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Virginia: +0.49 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@VanderbiltL27-344.99343.8161810.22
2vsMarshallW31-143.1221205.514700.18
3@Old DominionW37-17-6.0211155.521-100.15
4vsRutgersL23-266.4151228.130.64
5@MiamiL34-3821.6191417.414700.10
6@StanfordW31-7-8.221733.51-0.00
8vsBoston CollegeW42-211.21826614.8312010.96
9vsGeorgia TechW21-61.917794.602500.05
11vsClemsonL14-2413.3400.002210-0.49
13@DukeL28-315.619844.41220-0.06
14vsVirginiaW37-17-5.1181246.920.49

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.3%
Passing plays
7.1%
Rushing plays
47.6%
Standard downs
33.3%
Passing downs
21.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.110−0.64
EPA per play · 2024 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.