Skip to content
Ben Yurosek

#84Ben Yurosek

Ben Yurosek is a Versatile TE for Stanford.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ben Yurosek's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
53 Rush yards0 Rush TD11 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions239 Rec yards1 Rec TD14.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness53
  • Consistency73
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.70 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.42 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Arizona (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4202.42Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +1.25 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs USC: +0.50 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Sacramento State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona: +2.42 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oregon: +1.55 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Colorado: -0.04 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Hawai'iW37-24-16.4913815.31321.25
2@USCL10-569.445413.50230.50
3vsSacramento StateL23-300.10
4vsArizonaL20-2114.123517.50252.42
5vsOregonL6-4226.21.55
7@ColoradoW46-43-4.911212.0012-0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.6%
Passing plays
8.3%
Rushing plays
5.1%
Standard downs
7.0%
Passing downs
5.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.57
Passing downs
1.61
Pass / Rush EPA
1.17 / 0.55

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.