Skip to content
Avery Johnson

#2Avery Johnson

Avery Johnson is a Dual-Threat QB for Kansas State. Avery's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 448 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Avery Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
204/341 Comp/Att2380 Pass yards18 Pass TD6 INT59.8% Comp %
Rushing
477 Rush yards8 Rush TD109 Carries4.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

21
Attempts
13.0y
Avg depth
5.1y
After catch
71%
Catch rate

The ball travels 13.0 yards in the air on an average throw 5.2 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.1 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
1
0% · 0y
1
0% · 0y
short
7
86% · 113y
3
100% · 26y
7
86% · 60y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat93
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch87
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs North Dakota: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Army: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona: -0.08 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UCF: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Baylor: +0.26 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs TCU: +0.46 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Kansas: +0.71 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas Tech: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Oklahoma State: +0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Utah: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Colorado: +0.45 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsIowa StateL21-249.921/302732074.5211
1vsNorth DakotaW38-3528/433183058.14300.06
2vsArmyL21-240.815/251721163.11400.25
3@ArizonaL17-2312.013/29880011.9-161-0.08
5vsUCFW34-20-1.218/251682091.47500.32
6@BaylorL34-351.429/453392174.07210.26
7vsTCUW41-288.316/261983057.22900.46
9@KansasW42-174.111/172312090.81720.71
10vsTexas TechL20-4327.616/331991274.88820.16
12@Oklahoma StateW14-6-15.115/281771133.92600.13
13@UtahL47-5122.212/231021180.67210.23
14vsColoradoW24-14-8.310/171150085.03600.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.7%
Passing plays
99.2%
Rushing plays
24.5%
Standard downs
52.3%
Passing downs
70.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.24 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.03+0.02
EPA per play · 2024 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.