Skip to content
Aveon Smith

#0Aveon Smith

Aveon Smith is a Clutch Passer for Miami (OH). Aveon's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 152 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aveon Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
48/96 Comp/Att638 Pass yards2 Pass TD2 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
280 Rush yards1 Rush TD75 Carries3.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume92
  • Dual-Threat39
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.46 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.57 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Delaware State.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 1 vs Miami: -0.42 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Cincinnati: -0.96 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Delaware State: +0.57 EPA/play4Wk 8 vs Toledo: -0.19 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Akron: -0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Buffalo: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ball State: +0.52 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Toledo: +0.09 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@MiamiL3-389.61/337006.4-10-0.42
3@CincinnatiW31-24-6.800-0.96
4vsDelaware StateW62-200/200099.94800.57
8vsToledoL17-213.73/723002.820-0.19
9@OhioW30-16-1.67/111031032.22210.25
11vsAkronW19-0-21.68/17500020.8420-0.04
12vsBuffaloW23-10-15.29/161460030.56000.27
13@Ball StateW17-15-14.914/241701223.5800.52
14vsToledoW23-143.76/161090044.49900.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.3%
Passing plays
49.2%
Rushing plays
21.9%
Standard downs
30.0%
Passing downs
36.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.24 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.