Skip to content

Miami (OH) RedHawks

Mid-American·1-1·
Elo
1259#125
SP+
-10.0#104
FPI
-12.2
AP
NR
Next@ Cincinnati · Wk 3Win prob 25%Model +10.6
Talent #86 (621.4)Recruiting class #10514% production returning

Roster · 121 players

FR 50SO 24JR 25SR 22
#PlayerPosClHtWt
6Caleb HeavnerQBSR6'2"220
11Drew BellisariQBFR6'3"190
13Thomas GotkowskiQBSO6'0"189
16David McCombQBFR6'4"220
19Luke BerryQBFR6'5"235
5Rodney NelsonRBJR5'8"195
9D'Shawntae JonesRBSO5'10"248
20Cade YacamelliRBSR6'0"219
21Lazaro RogersRBSO5'10"200
22Chancellor SparksRBFR5'9"180
25Ike StewardRBFR5'11"225
0Keith ReynoldsWRJR5'9"181
1Maleek HugginsWRSR5'11"180
2Brady SimmonsWRSR6'1"173
2Carl JenkinsWRSO6'2"177
3Quintin SimmonsWRFR6'1"170
4Devin HyattWRJR6'2"192
8Damarion WittenWRJR6'3"206
10Lynel Billups-WilliamsWRJR5'9"177
14Will PressleyWRFR6'1"190
18Braylon IsomWRSO6'3"217
18Justen HodgeWRFR6'1"190
23Ian TepasWRFR6'0"202
24Scoop SmithWRFR5'5"150
27Jackson RuthWRFR5'10"175
80Michael ParrishWRJR6'2"189
82Andrew BjorsonWRFR6'0"191
84Tristan ReedWRFR6'5"180
86Wilson RobertsWRFR6'0"189
87Leo ScheidlerWRSR6'1"195
88CJ CastnerWRFR5'9"175
15Christian RossTEJR6'4"225
44Noam ButbulTEFR6'0"224
48Gray MaultsbyTEFR6'5"239
81Brendan LoftusTEFR6'6"210
83Eric KarnerTESO6'5"226
85Trey ZvonarTEFR6'3"232
89Brayden BoeingTEFR6'5"231
50Zach HultgrenOLFR6'5"290
51Eric SmithOLSR6'6"306
54Evan MalcoreOLSR6'6"305
55Ayden AnnarinoOLFR6'3"298
56Mitchell ButlerOLJR6'4"290
58Max HauckOLFR6'3"290
61Andrew LowryOLJR6'8"310
63Max KiefOLFR6'5"270
66Dominik KosznickiOLFR6'5"260
70Jacob SchorschOLSO6'5"300
71Lucas BarnesOLFR6'8"304
72Kris ManuOLSO6'1"300
73Brandon Lawhorn MooreOLSR6'6"311
74Greg Smith Jr.OLJR6'4"300
76Brian BeidatschOLSR6'4"284
77Shaun ShahuOLSR6'7"305
78Devontae ArmstrongOLSO6'5"314
79Jonathan StanglOLFR6'8"346
4Kam WilsonDLSR6'2"253
5Devin BellDLSO6'1"236
9Javon HammondsDLSO6'4"237
14Mikah ColemanDLSR6'4"265
20Zhaiylen ScottDLSO6'1"240
22Bai JobeDLJR6'4"249
23Isaiah HarrisDLFR6'2"210
27London Shackleford-VickroyDLFR6'4"242
32James SchottDLJR6'4"246
47Brach RiceDLSO6'1"260
49Anthony LudingtonDLFR6'4"234
52Marcus MooreDLJR6'1"310
59Mohamed BangouraDLFR6'7"235
67Carson NoonanDLFR6'3"273
90Donovan DavisDLSO6'1"307
91Sam WilliamsDLJR6'2"234
92Roosevelt Andrews IIIDLJR6'1"255
93Logan HowellDLFR6'4"295
95Aariz TaylorDLFR6'3"242
96Carmine OrozcoDLFR6'4"308
97William Goodvine IIIDLSO6'1"279
99OJ AlexanderDLSO6'2"291
3Malcolm McCainLBJR6'0"230
8CJ YoungLBJR6'0"215
11Brock UihleinLBJR6'1"226
15Blayne MyrickLBSR6'3"226
16Christian McKinneyLBJR6'0"209
26Eli CoppessLBSR6'1"213
33Harrison BrewsterLBSO6'1"214
35Tyler DikosLBJR6'1"226
37Vito McConnellLBFR6'3"221
43Grant LyonsLBSR6'3"242
45Ryan StolarskiLBFR6'1"220
46Luke MyersLBSR6'1"215
48Brody SinkLBFR6'4"205
53Malik RayLBJR5'10"240
57Evan GilderLBFR6'1"235
0Amariyun KnightenDBSR6'0"174
1Dillon TatumDBSR5'11"210
2Jackson PonsDBSO6'1"194
6Jermaine AgeeDBSO5'11"181
6Adrian Walker Jr.DBSO5'9"175
12Kaleb MartinDBJR6'0"170
13Desmon YharbroughDBFR6'3"207
17Ben MinichDBSR6'0"197
18Isaiah RollinsDBSO6'0"172
19Jerome SmithDBFR6'2"188
21Toney Coleman Jr.DBJR6'1"185
24Mychal YharbroughDBSR6'2"199
25Mitch BoldenDBJR6'0"206
28Leo ColombiDBSO6'3"213
29Easton JointerDBFR6'1"205
30Josh RingerDBSO6'1"210
31Mason EllensDBFR5'11"165
34Amir MorelanDBFR6'2"177
36Tommy ThiesDBFR5'11"185
38Max DeckardDBFR5'11"170
39Eli LimourisDBFR5'10"185
44Jake BrittDBFR6'0"197
31Brady StidhamPKFR5'10"170
36Carter HoldenPKSO6'3"205
38Kellan McLaughlinPKJR5'10"174
34Pierse StaintonPSR6'1"190
60Trey WallmanLSSR6'2"225
64Nick BradyLSFR6'1"210

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
29.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
33.0
scoring defense
Differential
-3.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
363.0#96
Yards / play
6.5#52
Passing yards / game
248.5#60
Rushing yards / game
114.5#107
First downs / game
19.5#85
3rd down %
38.1%#92
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
32:12#45
Defense
Yards allowed / game
413.5#112
Yards / play allowed
6.9#127
Pass yards allowed / game
310.5#129
Rush yards allowed / game
103.0#59
3rd down % allowed
50.0%#116
Sacks
2#81
Tackles for loss
6#91
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-1#89
Takeaways
0#118
Giveaways
1#31
Penalties / game
6.0#52
Penalty yards / game
51.5#66

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Miami (OH) is in year 13 under Chuck Martin, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 31st at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 123rd at staying on schedule through the air, and they are 115th on first and second down.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (−2.8%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −34.4% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Miami (OH) has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #31
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensestaying on schedule through the air
    #123
    projected
  • Offensefirst and second down
    #115
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #113
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
6.85.2
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
5.8
of 10 games
Bowl odds
82%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
89%
vs Massachusetts
Toughest
24%
vs Western Michigan

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 28% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (28%)Bowl eligible 82% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBDavid McComb
+29.5 EPA
WRMaleek Huggins, Damarion Witten +4
+28.1 EPA
RBD'Shawntae Jones
+2.5 EPA
TEChristian Ross
+1.9 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBDavid McComb
~$936K
EPA +29.50.657/play45 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.4482nd#26
Def0.2320th#110
Explosiveness
Off1.4180th#29
Def1.4517th#115
Field position
Off72.168th#45
Def73.342nd#80
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.6388th#18
Def5.009th#125
Turnovers
Won 0Lost 1
Margin -1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.7090th#15
Off · rush
0.0532nd#94

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.0532nd#94
Def0.1136th#88
Passing
Off0.7088th#17
Def0.3524th#105

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.95#81
2nd-level / open-field
0.88 / 0.62
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 7.7%
Havoc — total (def)
9.8%#133
Havoc — front 7 / DB
5.7% / 4.1%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.44
Def0.13
Pass downs
Off0.42
Def0.40

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.49#100.04#980.66#61
Defense0.12#1090.01#510.89#124

Elo Trajectory

@PittsburghFinal
Elo rating 13641252-112 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.1129th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.438th
  • Offense success rate32%11th
  • Defense success rate allowed55%5th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs36%12th
  • Offense success — passing downs27%28th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs54%15th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs57%4th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.589th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.328th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.288th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.056th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.211th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.220th
  • Offense highlight yards0.0512th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.619th
  • Offense power success1.099th
  • Defense power success allowed0.6067th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1647th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2050th

Third down

  • Third down conversion31%20th
  • Third down distance faced9.81st
  • Third down conversion allowed64%2nd
  • Third down distance forced6.737th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.1220th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.303rd

Drives

  • Points per drive1.331st
  • Points per drive allowed4.95th
  • Average starting field position2638th
  • Opponent starting field position2943rd
  • Available yards gained30%15th
  • Available yards allowed79%7th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive73%36th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%16th
  • Points per scoring opportunity1.827th
  • Points allowed per opportunity4.99th
  • Three-and-out rate45%15th
  • Three-and-outs forced17%26th

Roster

  • Returning usage29%33rd
  • Returning EPA31.914th
  • Team talent composite62138th
  • Recruiting class rank10524th
  • Recruiting class points17624th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.436#26 · top 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.699#17
Rush EPA/play
+0.052#94
Explosiveness
1.414#29
Pts/opportunity
5.63#18
Success rate
50.7%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.647 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Coverage-heavy defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.228#110 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
9.8%#133
Front-7 havoc
5.7%
DB havoc
4.1%
Big play rate allowed
1.454#115
Success rate allowed
41.3%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

29.5 PPG offense, 33.0 allowed — -3.5 margin/game
Points per game
29.5
Points allowed/game
33.0
Scoring margin/game
-3.5
Turnover margin
-1won 0 · lost 1
Production returning
14%
Talent rank (247)
#86

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE82thEXPLOSIVENESS80thFINISHING88thFIELD POS68thDEFENSE20thHAVOC4th50th100th
Offense
82th
Explosiveness
80th
Finishing
88th
Field Pos
68th
Defense
20th
Havoc
4th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-11.2
#114
Offense
-5.6
#110
Defense
+5.7
#121
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.274.92
Starting field positionown 26.1own 29.2
Available yards29.5%79.4%
Scoring opportunities72.7%100.0%
Points per opportunity1.754.92
Three-and-out rate45.5%16.7%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
73.0%
Expected, given the spots
57.3%
Over expected
+15.7
Fourth down vs peers
-1
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Miami (OH) is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Miami (OH) in 2026

by EPA/play distance
LouisvilleSP+ +10.0
Off EPA/play +0.474Def EPA/play +0.231Elo 1668
Match
98%
ArmySP+ +2.2
Off EPA/play +0.424Def EPA/play +0.188Elo 1527
Match
98%
UtahSP+ +13.0
Off EPA/play +0.472Def EPA/play +0.182Elo 1817
Match
97%
Wake ForestSP+ +1.6
Off EPA/play +0.443Def EPA/play +0.163Elo 1516
Match
97%
PurdueSP+ +1.2
Off EPA/play +0.351Def EPA/play +0.210Elo 1318
Match
96%
NC StateSP+ -0.7
Off EPA/play +0.385Def EPA/play +0.159Elo 1509
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -14.5, #102 of 1282016: +1.1, #57 of 1282017: -0.7, #65 of 1302018: -5.5, #94 of 1302019: -9.7, #101 of 1302021: -3.8, #83 of 1302022: -15.3, #114 of 1312023: -2.3, #75 of 1332024: +1.4, #63 of 1342025: -6.0, #81 of 1362026: -11.2, #114 of 138
20152026
Now -11.2 · #114 of 138Best +1.4 in 2024Worst -15.3 in 2022

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.0-0.0
20257-76-2
50%
7.4-0.4
20249-57-2
64%
7.2+1.8
202311-38-1
79%
9.0+2.0
20226-74-4
46%
4.8+1.2
20217-65-3
54%
8.3-1.3
20202-12-1
67%
1.3+0.7
20198-67-2
57%
5.8+2.2
20186-66-2
50%
6.1-0.1
20175-74-4
42%
7.1-2.1

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.2%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 6.9-5.4. Wins the Mid-American in 11%.

If they finish with…

17%
1 loss
0.8%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 17%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

down 2.8 points since preseasonlost 14-59 to Pittsburgh against an expected margin of 13, so 32.4 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 17% where the average Mid-American team is 27%.
  • The Mid-American takes 0.05 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.2% of seasons, having won their league in 99% of those.

Miami (OH)’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk3at Cincinnati0.9
  • wk13at Western Michigan0.6
  • wk4vs UConn0.3
  • wk10vs Buffalo0.2
  • wk11vs Ohio0.2
  • wk8at Central Michigan0.2

Who to root for

Games Miami (OH) is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk2Lindenwood over Missouri State0.1
  • wk3Kansas State over Tulane0.1
  • wk6UAB over Memphis0.1
  • wk13San José State over North Dakota State0.1
  • wk9Notre Dame over Navy0.1
  • wk8Northern Illinois over Hawai'i0.1
The full playoff picture →

Mid-American

0-0 in league play, projected 5.0-3.03 of 13 by title odds
11%
Wins the Mid-American
23%
Reaches the title game

The Mid-American sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk13Miami (OH) at Western Michigan22.4
  • wk11Ohio at Miami (OH)13.7
  • wk10Buffalo at Miami (OH)13.2
  • wk8Miami (OH) at Central Michigan12.4

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mid-American race →

If not the playoff, then

74%
Bowl eligible
73%
Placed in a bowl
0.2%
In the playoff
27%
Season over in November

Miami (OH) is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.1% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Arizona Bowl11%
  • GameAbove Sports Bowl11%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl9.9%
  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl8.8%
  • Boca Raton Bowl8.3%
  • Cure Bowl7.1%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 5 have sent Miami (OH) a player since 2010 — 13 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Miami (OH)'s feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Central CatholicPA50
WashingtonOH30
Ben DavisIN20
WayneOH20
Penn HillsPA10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.