Skip to content
David McComb

#16David McComb

David McComb is a Dual-Threat QB for Miami (OH). David's 2026 season produced 29.5 total EPA across 45 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So David McComb's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
29/46 Comp/Att474 Pass yards4 Pass TD0 INT63.0% Comp %
Rushing
-7 Rush yards1 Rush TD6 Carries-1.2 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

32
Attempts
9.4y
Avg depth
5.3y
After catch
47%
Catch rate

The ball travels 9.4 yards in the air on an average throw 1.6 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.3 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
3
0% · 0y
1
100% · 30y
1
0% · 0y
short
10
50% · 47y
4
50% · 37y
13
54% · 51y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat64
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch0
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 1.44 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Holy Cross.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4401.44Wk 1 vs Pittsburgh: +0.21 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Holy Cross: +1.44 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@PittsburghL14-5910.116/3324010-1900.21
2vsHoly CrossW45-713/13234301211.44

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.2%
Passing plays
90.6%
Rushing plays
6.9%
Standard downs
35.9%
Passing downs
64.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.80
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.70 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.