Skip to content
Anthone Taylor

#1Anthone Taylor

RB·Buffalo·20141.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Anthone Taylor is a Featured Back for Buffalo. Anthone's 2014 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 288 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Anthone Taylor's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1403 Rush yards12 Rush TD282 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions108 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving30
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Massachusetts (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3800.38Wk 1 vs Duquesne: +0.08 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Army: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Baylor: -0.30 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Norfolk State: +0.16 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Miami (OH): +0.17 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Bowling Green: +0.36 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.02 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Central Michigan: -0.13 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Ohio: -0.38 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Akron: +0.04 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Massachusetts: +0.38 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsDuquesneW38-28301153.821600.08
2@ArmyL39-47-16.916794.9033000.07
3vsBaylorL21-6323.913473.611-40-0.30
4vsNorfolk StateW36-7281164.101900.16
5vsMiami (OH)W35-27-18.7362226.230.17
6@Bowling GreenL35-36-5.4362196.130.36
7@Eastern MichiganL27-37-25.9241285.301700.02
9vsCentral MichiganL14-20-5.214251.804210-0.13
11@OhioL14-37-11.717372.20140-0.38
12vsAkronW55-24-9.4321785.611400.04
14@MassachusettsW41-21-20.2362376.6233100.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.4%
Passing plays
6.1%
Rushing plays
65.7%
Standard downs
42.5%
Passing downs
24.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.460−0.46
EPA per play · 2014 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.