Skip to content
Alex Perry

#9Alex Perry

Alex Perry is a Versatile WR for Florida International. Alex's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 84 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Alex Perry's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
56 Receptions840 Rec yards9 Rec TD15.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume27
  • Explosiveness53
  • Consistency71
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.74 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Sam Houston (SP+ -28).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7401.74Wk 1 vs Bethune-Cookman: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Penn State: +1.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.85 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Delaware: +0.40 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs UConn: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Western Kentucky: +0.38 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kennesaw State: +0.35 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Missouri State: +0.64 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Liberty: +0.43 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Jacksonville State: -0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Sam Houston: +1.74 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBethune-CookmanW42-93175.7011-0.13
2@Penn StateL0-3418.12157.50131.12
3vsFlorida AtlanticW38-28-8.724623.01260.85
4vsDelawareL16-38-10.958416.81470.40
6@UConnL10-515.14328.00110.37
8@Western KentuckyW25-61.638628.70360.38
9vsKennesaw StateL26-45-5.477510.70350.35
10@Missouri StateL21-28-10.735317.71250.64
11@Middle TennesseeW56-30-16.057114.22200.29
12vsLibertyW34-27-9.088811.01360.43
13vsJacksonville StateW27-21-6.7410927.3164-0.19
14vsSam HoustonW56-16-27.8714020.02351.74
20vsUTSAL20-573.73248.0014

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.4%
Passing plays
19.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
8.4%
Passing downs
11.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.