Skip to content
Aidan O'Connell

#16Aidan O'Connell

QB·Purdue·202220217.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Aidan O'Connell is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Purdue. Aidan's 2022 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 523 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aidan O'Connell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
319/497 Comp/Att3481 Pass yards22 Pass TD13 INT64.2% Comp %
Rushing
-81 Rush yards1 Rush TD43 Carries-1.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat75
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch56
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.91 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Indiana State.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9100.91Wk 1 vs Penn State: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Indiana State: +0.91 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Syracuse: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Minnesota: +0.18 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Maryland: +0.38 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nebraska: +0.49 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wisconsin: +0.42 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Iowa: -0.25 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Illinois: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northwestern: +0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Indiana: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan: +0.23 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsPenn StateL31-3522.429/583561069.4-1700.27
2vsIndiana StateW56-017/192114093.10.91
3@SyracuseL29-322.539/554243185.6700.30
5@MinnesotaW20-1016.027/401990267.51000.18
6@MarylandW31-2911.230/413602178.3-2500.38
7vsNebraskaW43-37-1.235/543914173.1300.49
8@WisconsinL24-358.331/463201343.2-2010.42
10vsIowaL3-2412.720/431680218.5-260-0.25
11@IllinoisW31-2415.925/402373187.83300.43
12vsNorthwesternW17-9-13.416/251592045.3-400.07
13@IndianaW30-16-7.118/292902073.0-600.38
14vsMichiganL22-4332.032/4736602-3600.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.3%
Passing plays
97.7%
Rushing plays
5.1%
Standard downs
47.6%
Passing downs
84.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.362022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Purdue
12.5
302.9
2022Purdue
7.4
237.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.