Skip to content
Abu Sama III

#3Abu Sama III

Abu Sama III is a Committee Back for Iowa State. Abu's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 98 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Abu Sama III's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
732 Rush yards5 Rush TD141 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions19 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume59
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency35
  • Receiving28
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency35th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs South Dakota.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs South Dakota: +0.74 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa: +0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas State: +0.13 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Arizona: -0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Cincinnati: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado: +0.32 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsKansas StateW24-217.014433.10
1vsSouth DakotaW55-73237.710.74
2vsIowaW16-1319.712473.902600.04
3@Arkansas StateW24-16-8.89697.711500.13
5vsArizonaW39-1412.012262.20-0.34
6@CincinnatiL30-384.518965.302800.02
7@ColoradoL17-24-8.3241777.420.32
9vsBYUL27-4115.99637.00
10vsArizona StateL19-243.92147.00
11@TCUW20-178.37304.30
13vsKansasW38-144.119573.00
14@Oklahoma StateW20-13-15.112877.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.5%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
35.0%
Standard downs
24.3%
Passing downs
11.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.01
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.27 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.