Skip to content
Xavier Arline

#7Xavier Arline

QB·Navy·2023

Xavier Arline is a Clutch Passer for Navy. Xavier's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 118 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Xavier Arline's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
23/44 Comp/Att320 Pass yards2 Pass TD2 INT52.3% Comp %
Rushing
257 Rush yards2 Rush TD77 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume70
  • Dual-Threat42
  • Consistency7
  • Clutch72
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency7th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0301.03Wk 2 vs Wagner: -1.03 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs North Texas: +0.33 EPA/play6Wk 10 vs Temple: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UAB: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Carolina: +0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs SMU: -0.61 EPA/play13Wk 15 vs Army: -0.37 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsNotre DameL3-4220.10/10000.1-100
2vsWagnerW24-0-1.03
6vsNorth TexasW27-24-6.70.33
10@TempleL18-32-21.06/141241024.39710.16
11vsUABW31-6-14.77/10941137.310910.29
12vsEast CarolinaW10-0-12.810/111020034.46800.13
13@SMUL14-5910.10/60000.7-130-0.61
15vsArmyL11-17-4.00/200160-0.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.4%
Passing plays
37.5%
Rushing plays
19.6%
Standard downs
21.1%
Passing downs
32.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.03
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.06 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.