Skip to content
Tylan Hines

#1Tylan Hines

Tylan Hines is a Pass-Catching Back for Hawai'i. Tylan's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 59 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tylan Hines's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
162 Rush yards0 Rush TD39 Carries4.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
23 Receptions186 Rec yards3 Rec TD8.1 Yards/rec
Returns
18 Kick returns302 KR yards0 KR TD9 Punt returns100 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.67 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.12 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Boise State (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1701.17Wk 1 vs UCLA: +0.23 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Sam Houston: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northern Iowa: -0.27 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs San Diego State: +0.58 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boise State: +1.12 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington State: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Nevada: +0.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Fresno State: +0.35 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UNLV: -0.08 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Utah State: -0.59 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs New Mexico: -1.17 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsDelaware StateW35-14
1vsUCLAL13-16-1.342900.23
3@Sam HoustonL13-31-6.91900.68
4vsNorthern IowaW36-722211.00350-0.27
6@San Diego StateL24-27-15.42199.5033310.58
7vsBoise StateL7-2810.1210.5012711.12
8@Washington StateL10-421.33186.0054210.21
9vsNevadaW34-13-15.27263.7021100.06
10@Fresno StateW21-20-3.812665.5032100.35
11vsUNLVL27-299.37213.00-0.08
12@Utah StateL10-55-10.43-4-1.30190-0.59
14vsNew MexicoW38-30-14.81-7-7.00-1.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
4.6%
Rushing plays
14.4%
Standard downs
9.2%
Passing downs
6.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.