#6Ty Gangi

QB·Nevada·20175.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Ty Gangi is a Dual-Threat QB for Nevada. Ty's 2017 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 385 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ty Gangi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing

228/374 Comp/Att2746 Pass yards25 Pass TD11 INT61.0% Comp %

Rushing

180 Rush yards4 Rush TD53 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Punting

6 Punts174 Punt yards29.0 Yards/punt44 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

Efficiency18
Volume100
Dual-Threat57
Consistency74
Clutch100

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Colorado State (SP+ 4).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	@Northwestern	L20-31	11.2	16/37	199	2	1	39.8	16	0	0.03
2	vsToledo	L24-37	6.6	19/37	277	2	1	36.9	20	1	0.13
5	@Fresno State	L21-41	-2.7	31/48	253	2	3	19.4	-5	0	-0.10
6	vsHawai'i	W35-21	-19.7	25/32	278	4	1	94.4	35	1	0.44
7	@Colorado State	L42-44	3.9	23/40	428	4	0	87.2	11	0	0.63
8	vsAir Force	L42-45	-11.0	17/33	239	2	0	84.4	41	1	0.30
10	@Boise State	L14-41	9.1	24/37	160	1	3	30.6	19	0	-0.01
11	vsSan José State	W59-14	-20.0	16/23	232	3	0	92.2	18	1	0.61
12	@San Diego State	L23-42	4.5	33/54	414	3	1	81.9	10	0	0.38
13	vsUNLV	W23-16	-14.5	24/33	266	2	1	81.9	15	0	0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

63.0%

Passing plays

96.7%

Rushing plays

17.3%

Standard downs

58.5%

Passing downs

72.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.15
Passing downs: 0.54
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.29 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg

EPA per play · 2017 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.