Skip to content
Trell Harris

#11Trell Harris

Trell Harris is a Versatile WR for Kent State. Trell's 2023 season produced 24.4 total EPA across 36 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trell Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
26 Receptions400 Rec yards1 Rec TD15.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency72
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.95 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.83 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Arkansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8301.83Wk 1 vs UCF: +1.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +1.83 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Central Connecticut: +0.98 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Fresno State: +0.55 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 11 vs Bowling Green: +0.01 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ball State: +0.09 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northern Illinois: +0.27 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@UCFL6-563.44369.00131.06
2@ArkansasL6-283.547819.50361.83
3vsCentral ConnecticutW38-1039431.31430.98
4@Fresno StateL10-532.522512.50160.55
7@Eastern MichiganL14-28-12.322412.00120.26
11vsBowling GreenL19-49-7.857815.60280.01
12@Ball StateL3-34-14.93134.30100.09
13vsNorthern IllinoisL27-37-7.535217.30400.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.0%
Passing plays
17.4%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
7.1%
Passing downs
9.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
1.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.66 / 1.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.