Skip to content
Tory Blaylock

#6Tory Blaylock

Tory Blaylock is a Committee Back for Oklahoma. Tory's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 135 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tory Blaylock's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
482 Rush yards4 Rush TD120 Carries4.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions77 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.9 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns1 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume49
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency27
  • Receiving48
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.53 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.57 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Illinois State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 1 vs Illinois State: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Temple: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Auburn: -0.37 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Kent State: +0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas: -0.11 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Carolina: +0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ole Miss: -0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tennessee: -0.81 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Alabama: -0.82 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs LSU: -0.34 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIllinois StateW35-38445.5121800.57
2vsMichiganW24-1312.49242.70140-0.15
3@TempleW42-3-5.1141007.120.40
4vsAuburnW24-1711.611131.202100-0.37
6vsKent StateW44-0-19.315785.200.05
7vsTexasL6-2316.211333.00140-0.11
8@South CarolinaW26-75.9191015.311500.14
9vsOle MissL26-3424.06101.70100-0.47
10@TennesseeW33-2715.0100.00-0.81
12@AlabamaW23-2114.8410.30-0.82
14vsLSUW17-1310.311423.80-0.34
20vsAlabamaL24-3414.811363.305360

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.1%
Passing plays
4.5%
Rushing plays
31.6%
Standard downs
21.0%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.06
Passing downs
-0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / -0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Tory Blaylock Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Oklahoma · Gridpex