Skip to content
Ta'Quan Roberson
Ta'Quan Roberson

#2Ta'Quan Roberson

QB·UConn·2023

Ta'Quan Roberson is a Clutch Passer for UConn. Ta'Quan's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 306 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ta'Quan Roberson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
197/338 Comp/Att2075 Pass yards12 Pass TD6 INT58.3% Comp %
Rushing
120 Rush yards2 Rush TD46 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency66
  • Clutch75
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • ▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 1.00 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Boston College (SP+ -6).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.000−1.00Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.52 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida International: -0.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Duke: -0.10 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah State: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Rice: +0.75 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs South Florida: +0.14 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Boston College: +1.00 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tennessee: +0.27 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs James Madison: +0.12 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Sacred Heart: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: +0.26 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2@Georgia StateL14-35-6.819/302162133.71100.52
3vsFlorida InternationalL17-24-21.215/32170109.180-0.26
4vsDukeL7-419.413/28114009.3-81-0.10
5vsUtah StateL33-34-10.923/322552134.71500.32
6@RiceW38-31-10.215/192152091.4700.75
8vsSouth FloridaL21-24-6.619/341751129.82410.14
9@Boston CollegeL14-21-5.911/241300029.3——1.00
10@TennesseeL3-5916.224/402180252.4-200.27
11@James MadisonL6-4411.820/362070152.6-100.12
12vsSacred HeartW31-3—22/352014060.53000.29
13@MassachusettsW31-18-17.516/281740038.83600.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.6%
Passing plays
91.5%
Rushing plays
11.1%
Standard downs
41.1%
Passing downs
67.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.35
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / -0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.