Skip to content
Sutton Smith

#5Sutton Smith

Sutton Smith is a Explosive Back for Memphis. Sutton's 2025 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 122 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sutton Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
669 Rush yards7 Rush TD102 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions109 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns155 KR yards1 KR TD15 Punt returns125 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume44
  • Explosiveness72
  • Consistency35
  • Receiving62
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency35th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia State: +0.24 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +0.94 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UAB: +0.48 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Florida: -0.20 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rice: -0.28 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Tulane: +0.30 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Carolina: +0.61 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Navy: +0.01 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW45-109606.711200.06
2@Georgia StateW38-16-24.514745.3144300.24
3@TroyW28-7-4.8181136.322700.08
4vsArkansasW32-315.11214712.310.94
5@Florida AtlanticW55-26-8.77263.70100-0.28
6vsTulsaW45-7-10.010343.411600.04
8@UABL24-31-15.85265.201500.48
9vsSouth FloridaW34-3111.610353.50150-0.20
10@RiceW38-14-14.8200.002110-0.28
11vsTulaneL32-386.322010.0021200.30
12@East CarolinaL27-318.0710915.612600.61
14vsNavyL17-286.26254.2031200.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.3%
Passing plays
5.2%
Rushing plays
25.9%
Standard downs
18.7%
Passing downs
8.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.02 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Sutton Smith Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Memphis · Gridpex