Skip to content
Rodney Hill

#1Rodney Hill

Rodney Hill is a Committee Back for Florida State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rodney Hill's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
190 Rush yards1 Rush TD50 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions83 Rec yards0 Rec TD16.6 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns42 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving45
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5400.54Wk 1 vs LSU: +0.31 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern Miss: +0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Boston College: +0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Clemson: -0.45 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: -0.12 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Duke: +0.30 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wake Forest: -0.54 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Pittsburgh: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs North Alabama: -0.33 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Louisville: -0.35 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLSUW45-2419.15295.800.31
2vsSouthern MissW66-13-14.45316.200.04
3@Boston CollegeW31-29-5.95428.401500.13
4@ClemsonW31-2410.5310.30-0.45
6vsVirginia TechW39-175.86132.20180-0.12
8vsDukeW38-209.46305.010.30
9@Wake ForestW41-16-7.95112.201230-0.54
10@PittsburghW24-7-7.3650.8024700.16
12vsNorth AlabamaW58-136193.20-0.33
14vsLouisvilleW16-68.0393.00-0.35
20vsGeorgiaL3-6331.2

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.8%
Passing plays
2.2%
Rushing plays
15.4%
Standard downs
9.6%
Passing downs
7.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.02
Passing downs
0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.65 / -0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Rodney Hill Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Florida State · Gridpex