Skip to content
Riley Ferguson

#4Riley Ferguson

QB·Memphis·2017201611.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Riley Ferguson is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Riley's 2017 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 504 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Riley Ferguson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
299/474 Comp/Att4257 Pass yards38 Pass TD9 INT63.1% Comp %
Rushing
22 Rush yards6 Rush TD54 Carries0.4 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts32 Punt yards32.0 Yards/punt32 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.70 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs East Carolina (SP+ -14).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7001.70Wk 1 vs UL Monroe: -0.06 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs UCLA: +0.77 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Illinois: +0.49 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UCF: +0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UConn: +0.67 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Navy: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Houston: +0.23 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Tulane: +0.64 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tulsa: +0.40 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs SMU: +0.95 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs East Carolina: +1.70 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.43 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Iowa State: +0.26 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUL MonroeW37-29-12.910/25970118.291-0.06
3vsUCLAW48-454.923/383986186.0-400.77
4vsSouthern IllinoisW44-3122/362882082.42300.49
5@UCFL13-4014.127/493211319.2-2000.03
6@UConnW70-31-19.234/484317091.7-1100.67
7vsNavyW30-27-0.724/402793052.7-600.30
8@HoustonW42-387.733/534711171.7-600.23
9vsTulaneW56-26-5.718/312983183.21820.64
10@TulsaW41-14-10.727/392984082.3200.40
12vsSMUW66-45-2.921/273202197.12930.95
13vsEast CarolinaW70-13-14.09/132993098.41401.70
14@UCFL55-6214.130/424714185.3-500.43
1vsIowa StateL20-217.521/332862050.1-2100.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.3%
Passing plays
97.4%
Rushing plays
8.3%
Standard downs
48.7%
Passing downs
69.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.69
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.46

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.870−0.252017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Memphis
9.5
238.2
2017Memphis
11.0
265.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.