Skip to content
Reymello Murphy
Reymello Murphy

#6Reymello Murphy

WR·Old Dominion·2023

Reymello Murphy is a Versatile WR for Old Dominion.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Reymello Murphy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
28 Receptions502 Rec yards3 Rec TD17.9 Yards/rec
Returns
7 Punt returns46 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume11
  • Explosiveness73
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.99 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 5.35 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Louisiana (SP+ 0).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+5.350−5.35Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +0.08 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana: +5.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wake Forest: +1.65 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs East Texas A&M: +0.58 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Marshall: +4.22 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs App State: +1.07 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs James Madison: +1.29 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Liberty: +0.68 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: +1.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia State: +2.34 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Virginia TechL17-365.8155.0050.08
2vsLouisianaW38-310.429748.52615.35
3vsWake ForestL24-27-7.911111.00111.65
4vsEast Texas A&MW10-9—34414.70410.58
5@MarshallL35-41-9.014242.00424.22
8vsApp StateW28-213.823316.50251.07
9@James MadisonL27-3011.857014.00451.29
11@LibertyL10-388.04389.50160.68
12@Georgia SouthernW20-17-5.245914.80271.25
13vsGeorgia StateW25-24-6.849624.01432.34
20vsWestern KentuckyL35-38-2.0177.007—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.0%
Passing plays
8.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.8%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.88
Passing downs
2.71
Pass / Rush EPA
1.63 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.