Skip to content
Reese White

#2Reese White

Reese White is a Committee Back for Coastal Carolina. Reese's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 84 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Reese White's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
252 Rush yards2 Rush TD77 Carries3.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions43 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.8 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns52 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume33
  • Explosiveness6
  • Consistency27
  • Receiving44
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs App State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1401.14Wk 1 vs UCLA: -0.32 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jacksonville State: +0.06 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: -1.14 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs App State: +0.55 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arkansas State: -0.47 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Marshall: +0.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Old Dominion: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas State: +0.24 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Army: -0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs James Madison: -0.84 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@UCLAL13-279.78212.60-0.32
2vsJacksonville StateW30-16-1.611232.1022400.06
5@Georgia SouthernL28-38-5.21-1-1.00-1.14
7@App StateW27-243.89465.1031800.55
8@Arkansas StateW27-17-6.3492.30-0.47
9vsMarshallW34-6-9.011333.010.11
10@Old DominionW28-24-10.16264.300.06
11vsTexas StateW31-23-1.612413.410.24
12@ArmyL21-28-4.03155.00120-0.26
13vsJames MadisonL14-5611.83-1-0.302-10-0.84
20vsSan José StateW24-14-3.49404.40100

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.6%
Passing plays
2.8%
Rushing plays
19.9%
Standard downs
13.1%
Passing downs
8.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.05
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.00

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.