Skip to content
Raleek Brown

#0Raleek Brown

RB·Arizona State·20251.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Raleek Brown is a Pass-Catching Back for Arizona State. Raleek's 2025 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 227 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Raleek Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1141 Rush yards4 Rush TD186 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
34 Receptions239 Rec yards2 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns35 KR yards0 KR TD2 Punt returns31 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume75
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency54
  • Receiving76
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Northern Arizona.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 1 vs Northern Arizona: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mississippi State: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas State: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Baylor: -0.15 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs TCU: +0.14 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Utah: +0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas Tech: +0.02 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Houston: +0.17 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Iowa State: -0.31 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs West Virginia: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Colorado: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arizona: +0.12 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthern ArizonaW38-195387.6131300.53
2@Mississippi StateL20-244.1181106.1031000.14
3vsTexas StateW34-152.31214412.0111100.33
4@BaylorW27-241.421803.803230-0.15
5vsTCUW27-248.3211346.4095000.14
7@UtahL10-4222.214674.8021700.16
8vsTexas TechW26-2227.619693.6141500.02
9vsHoustonL16-247.411645.8022000.17
10@Iowa StateW24-199.916644.00280-0.31
12vsWest VirginiaW25-23-6.814533.8032910.15
13@ColoradoW42-17-8.32225511.6113310.30
14vsArizonaL7-2312.013634.8011000.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.2%
Passing plays
10.9%
Rushing plays
41.7%
Standard downs
31.8%
Passing downs
14.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.06 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.620−0.39
EPA per play · 2025 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.