Skip to content
RaJa Nelson

#3RaJa Nelson

RaJa Nelson is a Versatile WR for North Dakota State. RaJa's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 50 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So RaJa Nelson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
29 Receptions440 Rec yards4 Rec TD15.2 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns168 KR yards0 KR TD1 Punt returns6 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency56
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.55 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.14 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Illinois State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.1402.14Wk 1 vs The Citadel: +1.26 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tennessee State: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Southeast Missouri State: +0.46 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs South Dakota: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Illinois State: +2.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Southern Illinois: +0.60 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Indiana State: +0.55 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Dakota State: +0.41 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Youngstown State: +1.71 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Dakota: -0.99 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Iowa: -0.68 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs St. Thomas (MN): +1.25 EPA/play13Wk 15 vs Illinois State: +0.11 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@The CitadelW38-026030.01341.26
2@Tennessee StateW59-33248.01130.43
3vsSoutheast Missouri StateW41-1444110.32170.46
5vsSouth DakotaW51-1325226.00300.22
6@Illinois StateW33-1613232.00322.14
7vsSouthern IllinoisW45-1726231.00360.60
8@Indiana StateW38-722311.50140.55
9@South Dakota StateW38-744310.80220.41
10vsYoungstown StateW38-3045213.00261.71
11@North DakotaW15-10-0.99
12vsNorthern IowaW48-161-4-4.000-0.68
13vsSt. Thomas (MN)W62-734515.00221.25
15vsIllinois StateL28-2911010.00100.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.1%
Passing plays
15.0%
Rushing plays
1.3%
Standard downs
5.4%
Passing downs
8.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.50
Passing downs
0.88
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / -0.45

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.