Skip to content
Paxton Lynch

#12Paxton Lynch

QB·Memphis·2015201411.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Paxton Lynch is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Paxton's 2015 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 517 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Paxton Lynch's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
296/443 Comp/Att3776 Pass yards28 Pass TD4 INT66.8% Comp %
Rushing
239 Rush yards2 Rush TD87 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat98
  • Consistency73
  • Clutch78
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.59 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs SMU (SP+ -18).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5901.59Wk 1 vs Missouri State: +0.43 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas: +0.94 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: +0.50 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Cincinnati: +0.53 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Florida: +0.35 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Ole Miss: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulsa: +0.72 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Tulane: +0.29 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Navy: +0.27 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Houston: +0.54 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Temple: +0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs SMU: +1.59 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Auburn: -0.26 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMissouri StateW63-78/12781084.12700.43
2@KansasW55-23-21.322/253542095.51400.94
3@Bowling GreenW44-417.529/403863088.81700.50
4vsCincinnatiW53-465.324/364122080.35200.53
5@South FloridaW24-173.620/333052072.8610.35
7vsOle MissW37-2427.039/533843163.1300.30
8@TulsaW66-42-8.532/444474096.0610.72
9vsTulaneW41-13-14.026/423431068.34300.29
10vsNavyL20-4512.126/423051167.92400.27
11@HoustonL34-356.220/312782169.14300.54
12@TempleL12-316.025/341560036.0-200.01
13vsSMUW63-0-17.59/142227098.7701.59
1vsAuburnL10-3114.616/371060113.4-10-0.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.4%
Passing plays
95.6%
Rushing plays
13.0%
Standard downs
45.3%
Passing downs
61.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.790−0.612015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Memphis
4.5
185.5
2015Memphis
11.4
281.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.