Skip to content
Paxton Lynch

#12Paxton Lynch

QB·Memphis·201520144.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Paxton Lynch is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Paxton's 2014 season ranks in the 5th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 511 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Paxton Lynch's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
259/413 Comp/Att3031 Pass yards22 Pass TD9 INT62.7% Comp %
Rushing
321 Rush yards13 Rush TD113 Carries2.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency5
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat62
  • Consistency67
  • Clutch75
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)5th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Cincinnati (SP+ 7).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Austin Peay: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCLA: +0.23 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.15 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: -0.41 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Cincinnati: +0.79 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Houston: -0.06 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs SMU: +0.53 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tulsa: +0.12 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Temple: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tulane: +0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: +0.63 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UConn: +0.18 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs BYU: +0.18 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAustin PeayW63-020/272422181.33420.50
2@UCLAL35-4217.727/413051068.62710.23
4vsMiddle TennesseeW36-17-8.721/352192149.61600.15
5@Ole MissL3-2420.713/3181015.1-240-0.41
6@CincinnatiW41-146.918/253112093.64520.79
7vsHoustonL24-285.426/372432325.4351-0.06
9@SMUW48-10-21.217/233071081.7-600.53
10vsTulsaW40-20-15.818/311830037.54710.12
11@TempleW16-13-4.721/282301072.1-100.36
12@TulaneW38-7-15.014/251781036.32610.28
13vsSouth FloridaW31-20-11.818/232322097.14420.63
14vsUConnW41-10-14.122/411944068.24000.18
1vsBYUW55-4810.224/463064347.13830.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.0%
Passing plays
98.8%
Rushing plays
17.5%
Standard downs
44.6%
Passing downs
65.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.790−0.612015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Memphis
4.5
185.5
2015Memphis
11.4
281.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.