#3Maxwell Woods

RB·Washington State·2025

Maxwell Woods is a Pass-Catching Back for Washington State. Maxwell's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 56 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Maxwell Woods's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

225 Rush yards0 Rush TD36 Carries6.3 Yards/carry

Receiving

18 Receptions148 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency3
Volume21
Explosiveness66
Consistency0
Receiving100

Player type

Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs North Texas (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
2	vsSan Diego State	W36-13	6.7	1	4	4.0	0	—	—	—	-0.11
3	@North Texas	L10-59	13.8	1	4	4.0	0	5	42	0	0.79
4	vsWashington	L24-59	18.4	—	—	—	—	3	23	0	-0.02
5	@Colorado State	W20-3	-15.6	3	26	8.7	0	1	5	0	0.16
8	@Virginia	L20-22	11.1	—	—	—	—	1	5	0	0.01
9	vsToledo	W28-7	6.0	1	2	2.0	0	—	—	—	-0.18
10	@Oregon State	L7-10	-15.9	4	20	5.0	0	—	—	—	-0.01
12	vsLouisiana Tech	W28-3	-1.3	1	-1	-1.0	0	2	10	0	-0.41
13	@James Madison	L20-24	12.3	10	43	4.3	0	3	28	0	0.16
14	vsOregon State	W32-8	-15.9	6	10	1.7	0	—	—	—	-0.64
20	vsUtah State	W34-21	-3.1	9	117	13.0	0	3	35	0	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

7.3%

Passing plays

5.9%

Rushing plays

9.0%

Standard downs

7.7%

Passing downs

6.5%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.11
Passing downs: 0.23
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.15 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).