Skip to content
Maurki James

#5Maurki James

Maurki James is a Committee Back for Old Dominion. Maurki's 2025 season produced 5.2 total EPA across 47 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Maurki James's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
224 Rush yards2 Rush TD56 Carries4.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
6 Receptions39 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.5 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns149 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving47
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Marshall (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 1 vs Indiana: -0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central: -0.31 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +0.09 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Liberty: -0.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.50 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Marshall: +0.52 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs James Madison: +0.09 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs App State: +0.10 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UL Monroe: -1.07 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@IndianaL14-2732.410323.20-0.27
2vsNorth Carolina CentralW54-66213.50120-0.31
3@Virginia TechW45-26-10.17263.710.09
5vsLibertyW21-7-9.0133.00110-0.11
6vsCoastal CarolinaW47-7-15.15265.201800.50
7@MarshallL24-48-4.512836.910.52
8@James MadisonL27-6312.38253.101200.09
9vsApp StateW24-21-11.45102.0022600.10
10@UL MonroeW31-6-21.62-2-1.00-1.07
12vsTroyW33-0-4.8

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.8%
Passing plays
2.8%
Rushing plays
17.0%
Standard downs
11.1%
Passing downs
10.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.