#9Luke Hasz

TE·Arkansas·2024

Luke Hasz is a Slot Specialist TE for Arkansas.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.42
Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
Total EPA (value)0.46
Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Hasz's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving

26 Receptions324 Rec yards4 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs TE peers

Efficiency100
Volume11
Explosiveness36
Consistency67
Pass-Down100

Player type

Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.39 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.05 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Mississippi State (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Ty Thompson	Tulane	2024	48	0.420	0.7	20.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsArkansas-Pine Bluff	W70-0	—	3	42	14.0	0	20	1.21
2	@Oklahoma State	L31-39	-2.6	2	46	23.0	1	43	1.99
4	@Auburn	W24-14	9.5	1	3	3.0	0	3	-0.11
5	vsTexas A&M	L17-21	17.0	1	2	2.0	0	2	-0.89
6	vsTennessee	W19-14	22.0	1	16	16.0	0	16	0.70
8	vsLSU	L10-34	15.9	2	22	11.0	0	11	1.31
9	@Mississippi State	W58-25	-4.1	4	59	14.8	2	30	2.05
10	vsOle Miss	L31-63	27.9	5	77	15.4	1	22	1.84
12	vsTexas	L10-20	24.1	2	11	5.5	0	10	0.09
13	vsLouisiana Tech	W35-14	-11.6	2	24	12.0	0	16	0.15
14	@Missouri	L21-28	14.0	3	22	7.3	0	9	0.75

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

3.8%

Passing plays

7.5%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.0%

Passing downs

5.5%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.70
Passing downs: 1.17
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.88 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).