Skip to content
Leon Haughton Jr.
Leon Haughton Jr.

#86Leon Haughton Jr.

Leon Haughton Jr. is a Red Zone Weapon TE for Old Dominion.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Leon Haughton Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
3 Receptions53 Rec yards1 Rec TD17.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume11
  • Explosiveness71
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 3.21 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.2103.21Wk 1 vs Norfolk State: +1.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia Tech: +3.21 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNorfolk StateW31-1024623.00381.24
2@Virginia TechL21-4412.4177.0173.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.8%
Passing plays
10.5%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.9%
Passing downs
5.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.29
Passing downs
3.76
Pass / Rush EPA
1.73 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.