Skip to content
Joshua Kelley

#27Joshua Kelley

RB·UCLA·201920184.4 pts line value1st Round

Joshua Kelley is a 2-year Featured Back for UCLA. Joshua's 2018 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 251 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joshua Kelley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1243 Rush yards12 Rush TD225 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions193 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume91
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency68
  • Receiving42
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Colorado (SP+ -1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6900.69Wk 1 vs Cincinnati: +0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma: -0.05 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Colorado: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Washington: +0.45 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs California: +0.33 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona: +0.07 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Utah: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oregon: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arizona State: -0.13 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Stanford: +0.13 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsCincinnatiL17-265.46203.3031900.04
2@OklahomaL21-4924.9571.40-0.05
5@ColoradoL16-38-0.71212410.3031000.69
6vsWashingtonL24-3119.9201256.3133900.45
7@CaliforniaW37-73.9301575.232800.33
8vsArizonaW31-303.6311364.4144300.07
9vsUtahL10-4116.816905.6121100.15
10@OregonL21-427.3261616.2163200.41
11@Arizona StateL28-315.021793.812170-0.13
12vsUSCW34-279.7402897.220.29
13vsStanfordL42-4913.018553.1221400.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.7%
Passing plays
7.4%
Rushing plays
58.6%
Standard downs
37.5%
Passing downs
20.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.780−0.312019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018UCLA
4.4
85.7
2019UCLA
2.0
58.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.