Skip to content
Jensen Jones

#5Jensen Jones

Jensen Jones is a Dual-Threat QB for Air Force. Jensen's 2023 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 50 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jensen Jones's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
5/15 Comp/Att160 Pass yards0 Pass TD1 INT33.3% Comp %
Rushing
233 Rush yards4 Rush TD47 Carries5.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume46
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency76
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.92 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Robert Morris.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9200.92Wk 1 vs Robert Morris: +0.92 EPA/play1Wk 5 vs San Diego State: +0.67 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Navy: -0.28 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Army: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: +0.60 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.29 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRobert MorrisW42-73510.92
5vsSan Diego StateW49-10-10.31010.67
7vsWyomingW34-27-3.6230
8@NavyW17-6-13.770-0.28
10vsArmyL3-23-4.01/2110081.51400.73
11@Hawai'iL13-27-16.43/7114019.95600.60
12vsUNLVL27-311.41/6350029.18820.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.2%
Passing plays
29.1%
Rushing plays
14.0%
Standard downs
13.4%
Passing downs
24.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.74
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.