Skip to content
Jehlani Galloway
Jehlani Galloway

Jehlani Galloway

Jehlani Galloway is a Versatile WR for Western Michigan.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jehlani Galloway's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
14 Receptions88 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume15
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency55
  • Pass-Down50
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (80th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 3.09 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Nick NashSan José State0.3100.514.0
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Ainias SmithTexas A&M0.3100.517.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.0903.09Wk 1 vs St. Francis (PA): -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: -0.06 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs Mississippi State: +0.48 EPA/play6Wk 13 vs Bowling Green: +3.09 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSt. Francis (PA)W35-174235.808-0.02
2@SyracuseL7-48-4.46325.3019-0.06
6@Mississippi StateL28-410.53175.7080.48
13vsBowling GreenL10-34-7.811616.00163.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.2%
Passing plays
10.5%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.2%
Passing downs
2.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.