Skip to content
Jeff Driskel

#6Jeff Driskel

QB·Louisiana Tech·20157.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jeff Driskel is a Dual-Threat QB for Louisiana Tech. Jeff's 2015 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 499 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jeff Driskel's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Passing
281/450 Comp/Att4033 Pass yards27 Pass TD8 INT62.4% Comp %
Rushing
323 Rush yards5 Rush TD92 Carries3.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat75
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch93
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Rice (SP+ -15).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 1 vs Southern: +0.82 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Kentucky: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kansas State: +0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida International: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana: +0.66 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UTSA: +0.27 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Mississippi State: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.44 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rice: +0.84 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Texas: +0.54 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs UTEP: +0.43 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Southern Miss: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.60 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouthernW62-1512/152744098.91510.82
2@Western KentuckyL38-4110.828/483572167.25510.29
3@Kansas StateL33-392.630/513141050.44220.13
4vsFlorida InternationalW27-17-16.618/322261054.72900.27
5vsLouisianaW43-14-7.120/332902093.85610.66
6@UTSAW34-31-17.728/443511254.11400.27
7@Mississippi StateL20-4515.125/413032167.91000.14
8vsMiddle TennesseeW45-16-4.620/303012091.42900.44
9@RiceW42-17-14.617/263204096.3-700.84
10vsNorth TexasW56-13-25.017/262960187.53500.54
12@UTEPW17-15-19.513/221882069.64200.43
13vsSouthern MissL24-581.427/443553342.3-1300.14
1vsArkansas StateW47-280.526/384583083.51600.60

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.1%
Passing plays
94.2%
Rushing plays
18.6%
Standard downs
52.7%
Passing downs
70.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.91+0.06
EPA per play · 2015 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.