Skip to content
Jayden Maiava

#14Jayden Maiava

Jayden Maiava is a 2-year Clutch Passer for USC. Jayden's 2026 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 82 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

44%
projected
band 26%'25 51%62%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Maiava's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
67/83 Comp/Att896 Pass yards10 Pass TD1 INT80.7% Comp %
Rushing
-11 Rush yards1 Rush TD6 Carries-1.8 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

53
Attempts
6.8y
Avg depth
7.2y
After catch
89%
Catch rate

The ball travels 6.8 yards in the air on an average throw 1.0 yards shorter than the median. Another 7.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
2
100% · 88y
1
100% · 31y
short
15
80% · 103y
13
92% · 152y
21
95% · 252y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Louisiana (SP+ -6).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 1 vs Fresno State: +0.44 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana: +0.81 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0vsSan José StateW42-26-12.825/292862090.0-91
1vsFresno StateW39-0-7.623/253493098.0-200.44
2vsLouisianaW49-30-5.719/29261510.81

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
40.7%
Passing plays
84.7%
Rushing plays
5.9%
Standard downs
34.9%
Passing downs
59.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
1.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.87 / -1.73

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.420−0.332025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023UNLV
7.0
220.6
2025USC
12.6
254.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.