Skip to content
Jayden de Laura

#7Jayden de Laura

QB·Arizona·20229.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jayden de Laura is a Dual-Threat QB for Arizona. Jayden's 2022 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 443 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden de Laura's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
272/435 Comp/Att3685 Pass yards25 Pass TD13 INT62.5% Comp %
Rushing
122 Rush yards4 Rush TD74 Carries1.6 Yards/carry
Punting
2 Punts83 Punt yards41.5 Yards/punt48 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch90
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.00 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Colorado (SP+ -20).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0001.00Wk 1 vs San Diego State: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mississippi State: -0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs North Dakota State: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs California: +0.62 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: +1.00 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oregon: +0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.71 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs USC: +0.38 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Utah: +0.18 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCLA: +0.67 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington State: +0.32 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona State: +0.44 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@San Diego StateW38-20-4.422/352994189.7-600.63
2vsMississippi StateL17-3915.423/452201323.1-250-0.01
3vsNorth Dakota StateW31-2820/282291069.25010.40
4@CaliforniaL31-49-3.027/454012278.31300.62
5vsColoradoW43-20-20.433/464846092.42801.00
6vsOregonL22-4918.924/422411155.8-3000.16
7@WashingtonL39-4915.725/344004084.74100.71
9vsUSCL37-4518.926/433803166.65400.38
10@UtahL20-4519.210/201590011.91310.18
11@UCLAW34-2815.022/283152083.2-310.67
12vsWashington StateL20-319.528/463571422.9-1010.32
13vsArizona StateW38-35-4.112/232000136.7-300.44

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.6%
Passing plays
93.7%
Rushing plays
13.8%
Standard downs
52.9%
Passing downs
76.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.63
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.84

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.100−0.11
EPA per play · 2022 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.