Skip to content
Jalon Calhoun

#5Jalon Calhoun

WR·Duke·2023

Jalon Calhoun is a Slot Specialist WR for Duke. Jalon's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 65 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalon Calhoun's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
50 Receptions666 Rec yards4 Rec TD13.3 Yards/rec
Returns
16 Punt returns142 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency63
  • Pass-Down80
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.67 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 5.61 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs NC State (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+5.6105.61Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Lafayette: +1.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern: +1.87 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UConn: +1.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Notre Dame: +0.00 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs NC State: +5.61 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida State: -0.57 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisville: +0.25 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wake Forest: +1.27 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Carolina: +1.00 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +1.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: +1.28 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsClemsonW28-710.55326.40100.24
2vsLafayetteW42-74389.51161.04
3vsNorthwesternW38-14-1.3511222.40341.87
4@UConnW41-7-15.667612.70241.21
5vsNotre DameL14-2120.134113.70210.00
7vsNC StateW24-37.416969.01695.61
8@Florida StateL20-3819.411111.0011-0.57
9@LouisvilleL0-238.055611.20190.25
10vsWake ForestW24-21-7.912020.00201.27
11@North CarolinaL45-477.466410.70231.00
12@VirginiaL27-30-10.845213.01341.17
13vsPittsburghW30-19-7.377110.11321.28
20vsTroyW17-109.822412.0026

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.9%
Passing plays
19.1%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
7.0%
Passing downs
12.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.65
Passing downs
0.83
Pass / Rush EPA
0.74 / -0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.